The take home message reinforces the need for design language that acknowledges object relevance in a variety of contexts. As designers, the ability to focus our energy on meeting anticipated needs that may develop over time, requires an understanding of our functional trajectory throughout the lifespan. We also need to be aware that the onset of mature age does not automatically mean we all of a sudden like surrounding ourselves with depressing artifacts!
It also brings up an interesting point on patient compliance. Might people be more accepting of an assistive device (ie. cane, walker) if the form was generally accepted to be beautiful or luxurious? I find this compelling, since patient compliance is typically a major safety risk and accounts for needless falls, injuries & subsequent medical care.
Seems like an interesting area of research, no?
Hopefully this article motivates Therapists to gain greater awareness of objects and services which are relevant to their clients' needs, without the negative stigma that has been present in assistive devices for far too long. As for Designers, hopefully it encourages them to push the limits of their concepts to satisfy the needs of today and tomorrow.
